Autism and the law
The law is vital for autistic people and their families.
It provides protections and sets out duties that public bodies and other organisations must meet.
But the law can be complex – and it can be hard to know which specific parts of the law are most important for autistic children, young people and adults, and their families.
On this page we set out some key points of law for autistic people and their families. We will keep this page updated to reflect any major changes to the law in the future.
The laws described here operate at different levels: some cover the whole UK, while others cover specific parts of the UK. It’s advisable to check this when carrying out your own research.
IMPORTANT NOTE
This information provided here is not legal advice, and the Autism Alliance UK cannot accept responsibility for any outcomes that result from the use of this information.
This page is a starting point for those who need to know about autism and the law. It isn’t a comprehensive guide to the law, and doesn’t cover every legal duty or provision that might be relevant for autistic people and their families.
This means it’s really important to carry out further research, and to get advice and help from an expert charity or a lawyer if you have questions or need additional support.
To assist with this, we have included links to:
Further reading on each of the points of law covered.
Charities and services that can provide practical support.
Resources that people and families can use, including template letters.
Legal practices that specialise in supporting autistic children, young people and adults, and their families.
CONTENTS
Reasonable adjustments in the workplace and in using services
Local authorities’ and schools’ duties regarding special educational needs (SEN)
Local authorities’ duties regarding adult care and support needs.
Charities and services that can provide further information and support
Legal practices that specialise in working with autistic people and their families
We hope the information on this page is helpful. We’re always looking to improve, and welcome feedback.
And if you want to know more after reading this page…
Then ‘Autism and the Law’, by Adam Feinstein, provides an excellent overview of how the law should protect autistic people and their families.
It is a valuable source of information about legal issues and the experiences of autistic people within the legal system.
Key points of law for autistic people and their families
Autistic people’s human rights are protected
The Human Rights Act 1998 protects the rights and freedoms of everyone in the UK. Some of these rights are particularly relevant for autistic people. For example:
Article 2: Right to life
This means that everyone’s life is protected in law, and that the Government must take steps to protect lives in the UK.
Article 3: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment
This means that you must not experience this treatment, including from public authorities. Public authorities must also take steps to stop this happening if they know it is happening, and carry out investigations where credible allegations are made.
Article 5: Right to liberty
This protects your individual freedom from detention that is unlawful. If you are detained, you have the right to ask a court to provide a quick decision on whether your detention is lawful: if it is not, the court can order your release.
Article 8: Respect for your private and family life, home and correspondence
This is wide ranging, but includes your right to control who sees and touches your body, to choose your lifestyle, to be part of your community if you want to, and not stopping you from living in your home without good reason.
Article 14: Protection from discrimination in respect of these rights and freedoms
This means that all of the rights and freedoms set out in the Human Rights Act must be secured without discrimination. This covers both direct discrimination - being treated less favourably than another person in a similar situation - and indirect discrimination - being disadvantaged by something that applies to everybody.
Further reading
The Human Rights Act Equality and Human Rights Commission
Learning, Disability, Autism and Human Rights
The British Institute of Human Rights
Autistic people should be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that they lack capacity
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets out the legal framework for determining whether an individual (usually once they are over the age of 16) has ‘capacity’ to make decisions, and if so what is in their ‘best interests’. ‘Capacity’ means the person’s ability to make a particular decision at the time it needs to be made. This can be relevant for autistic people, including those who have a learning disability.
The Mental Capacity Act sets out some key principles which must be applied by anyone considering whether a person has capacity and/or what is in their best interests:
The starting assumption must always be that the person has capacity, unless it is established that they lack capacity. (Section 1(2))
“All practicable steps” must be taken to try and help the person make a decision for themselves before they are deemed to lack capacity e.g. by using a different form of communication, such as non-verbal communication, or by treating a medical condition which may be affecting the person’s capacity. (Section 1(3))
The person must not be treated as lacking capacity because they make an unwise decision. (Section 1(4))
The person’s capacity must not be judged simply on the basis of their age, appearance, condition, or an aspect of their behaviour. (Section 2(3))
Any decision made on behalf of the person should be a decision that is less restrictive of their basic rights and freedoms – as long as it is still in their best interests. (Section 1(6))
Lack of capacity is defined as being unable to make a decision because of “an impairment of, or disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain” (Section 2(1)). The test to determine this should be applied by asking three questions:
Is the person able to make the decision?
Is there an impairment or disturbance in the functioning of the person’s mind or brain?
Is the person’s inability to make the decision because of the identified impairment or disturbance?
Autistic people have a right to reasonable adjustments in the workplace and in using services
The Equality Act 2010 is a fundamental law for autistic people. It protects people from discrimination, whether at work, or using a business or any public service.
Under the Equality Act, you have the right to ‘reasonable adjustments’ in the workplace or in the way services are provided, so that you are not treated less favourably than another person because of a ‘protected characteristic’.
‘Protected characteristics’ include disability, and you’re disabled under the Equality Act if you have a physical or mental impairment that has a ‘substantial’ and ‘long-term’ negative effect on your ability to do normal daily activities.
‘Substantial’ is more than minor or trivial - for example, it takes much longer than it usually would to complete a daily task.
‘Long-term’ means 12 months or more.
This means that whether or not you or your family use the term ‘disabled’, as an autistic child, young person or adult you have the right to reasonable adjustments.
Adjustments might include:
Changes in the way that education is provided in order to meet your needs, so you are able to learn.
The flexibility to work from home, or join meetings online, if social situations can be overwhelming.
A structured working day, to minimise uncertainty.
The NHS giving you a priority appointment because waiting in hospital can cause distress, or a longer appointment to give enough time to ensure what you say has been understood.
Providing information about an appointment well in advance, so you have chance to prepare.
However, the key is whether these adjustments are ‘reasonable’, which depends on how effective they are in addressing the disadvantage you would otherwise face, how practical they are, and their cost.
It’s also an anticipatory duty, which means that organisations shouldn’t wait for you to request reasonable adjustments: they should consider in advance what they can do to make their services accessible.
Further reading
Equality Act 2010: guidance
UK Government
Equality Act 2010
Equality and Human Rights Commission
Health and social care organisations must meet autistic people’s information and communication needs
The Accessible Information Standard (Section 250 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012) aims to ensure people who have a disability, impairment or sensory loss get information they can access and understand, and any communication support that they need. It applies to autistic people.
The Standard applies to the NHS and providers of adult social care. They must:
Ask people if they have any information or communication needs, and find out how to meet their needs.
Record those needs clearly.
Highlight or flag the person’s file or notes so it is clear that they have information or communication needs and how to meet those needs.
Share information about people’s information and communication needs with other providers of NHS and adult social care, when they have consent or permission to do so.
Take steps to ensure that people receive information which they can access and understand, and receive communication support if they need it.
Further reading
Local authorities and schools have a legal duty to meet children and young people’s special educational needs
Schools and local authorities must meet children and young people’s special educational needs. Not all autistic children and young people will need an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP), but even if they are not eligible for an EHCP, schools must identify their needs and provide support to meet their needs under a system called SEN Support. This is a 4 part cycle known as “Assess, Plan, Do, Review”. Schools must also make reasonable adjustments to support autistic children and young people, under the Equality Act 2010, as autism falls within the definition of disability in the Act.
Some children and young people will be eligible for more formal, structured support, as set out within an EHCP. Section 36(8) of the Children and Families Act 2014 says that if a local authority is asked to assess a child or young person’s special educational needs (SEN) for an EHCP, it must consider whether they have or may have SEN and whether they may need special educational provision to be made through an EHCP. These, and only these, are the tests set out in law. The key word is ‘may’; autistic children and young people are more likely to have these needs and require special provision, so it is more likely that they will be assessed for an EHCP.
If the local authority considers that a child or young person meets this test, it must agree to undertake an Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment. If it decides that an assessment is not necessary, this decision can be challenged in the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).
A child’s parents, a young person themselves, or someone from that child or young person’s school or college may make the request for an assessment to the local authority.
Under Regulation 5(1) of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014, the local authority must reply to a request to assess a child or young person within six weeks to let you know whether they will carry out an assessment.
If the local authority decides to assess, this does not necessarily mean they will decide to issue an EHCP. If they decide not to issue an EHCP, they must inform the parents or young person within 16 weeks from the date of the request, and again, this refusal will trigger a right of appeal to the Tribunal.
If the local authority decides to issue an EHCP, they must do so within 20 weeks of the initial request for assessment. Within this period, the parents or young person must be given at least 15 calendar days to comment on a draft EHCP and/or express a preference for a particular school or other educational setting, which the local authority must then go away and consult.
In addition to the specific assessment duty set out above, section 22 of the Children and Families Act 2014 says that local authorities must carry out their functions with a view to identifying all the children and young people in their area who have or may have SEN or have or may have a disability. This requires some proactive steps to be taken by local authorities to gather information about the cohort of children and young people with SEN in their area, including autistic children and young people. The SEND Code of Practice acknowledges at clause 1.15 that there are a number of ways local authorities may gather this information, giving local authorities considerable discretion in this area. This means that although the aim of the duty is clear, in practice it may be difficult to enforce.
Further reading
EHC plans, EHC needs assessments and SEND Tribunal appeals
IPSEA
Education, Health and Care Plans
Ambitious about Autism
Education, Health and Care Assessment
National Autistic Society
Navigating Education
Autism Central
Education should meet the needs of autistic children and young people whether or not they have an Education, Health and Care Plan
If an autistic child or young person has an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) their local authority must secure the provision set out in the EHCP, as set out in Section 42(2) of the Children and Families Act 2014. This is a non-negotiable; the local authority cannot just try.
However, whether or not an autistic child or young person has an EHCP, most* schools or other educational institutions must use their ‘best endeavours’ to meet that child or young person’s special educational needs; this is set out in Section 66 of the Children and Families Act 2014. Using ‘best endeavours’ means doing everything they reasonably can. This legal duty is on the school’s governing body, proprietor (if it is an academy) or management committee (if it is a Pupil Referral Unit), rather than the headteacher. In practical terms, having an EHCP (assuming you are entitled to one) gives you greater rights to support than relying on the school’s duty to use its ‘best endeavours’ - but the ‘best endeavours’ duty is nevertheless very important.
There is also a legal duty on local authorities under section 19 of the Education Act 1996 to make arrangements for the provision of suitable education (in school or out) for children of compulsory school age who, for whatever reason, may not receive suitable education unless such arrangements are made for them. This means that if an autistic child or young person is unable to attend school for reasons relating to, for example, their physical or mental health, the local authority may be required to put in place alternative educational support, for example, tuition at home, or arrange provision to help them get back into a suitable school.
An autistic child or young person will also be protected from unlawful disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, whether or not they have an EHCP. Schools must not discriminate in the way they admit (or refuse to admit), provide (or deny access to) education, provide (or deny access to) any benefit, facility or service, or in making decisions about exclusion for autistic pupils, as autism falls under the definition of disability in the Equality Act 2010. It will be unlawful for a school to treat an autistic pupil less favourably because of something to do with their being autistic, as autism falls under the definition of disability in the Equality Act 2010 - or for a school to have a policy, rule or practice in place which makes things more difficult for autistic pupils as a group (unless this treatment can be justified**). This means that schools are sometimes required to change things to ensure autistic pupils are not disadvantaged compared to their non-autistic peers. Claims for disability discrimination against schools are brought in the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).
On exclusions:
Paragraph 20 of the Government’s statutory guidance on exclusions, updated in 2023, says that “‘informal’ or ‘unofficial’ exclusions, such as sending a pupil home ‘to cool off’, are unlawful, regardless of whether they occur with the agreement of parents or carers. Any exclusion of a pupil, even for short periods of time, must be formally recorded”. It’s important to know that these exclusions are unlawful even if a parent/carer agrees that they should happen.
Pupils can only be excluded for disciplinary reasons. They cannot be lawfully excluded because their school or education setting cannot meet their needs, or because of the actions of their parents.
Historically, autistic children with a ‘tendency to physical…abuse’ were thought to fall outside the protection of the Equality Act 2010; however, in C&C v Governing Body [2018] UKUT 269 (AAC), the Upper Tribunal clarified that these children are afforded the same protection under the Equality Act 2010 as other disabled children. Now, if autistic children are excluded for reasons related to physical or violent behaviour, this could potentially amount to unlawful discrimination, depending on the steps taken by the school to meet that child’s needs and to make adjustments for their disability.
*The ‘best endeavours’ duty applies to mainstream schools, maintained nurseries, 16-19 academies, alternative provision academies, institutions in the further education sector and pupil referral units. It therefore doesn’t apply to independent or non-maintained schools/nurseries. The Equality Act 2010 duties will, however, still apply.
**This type of discrimination can only be justified if it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Examples of legitimate aims include maintaining academic standards, or ensuring the health, safety and welfare of other pupils. Whether the discrimination can be justified will depend on the circumstances of the particular case, but financial cost alone cannot, by itself, provide a lawful justification.
Local authorities have a duty to assess an adult’s need for care and support, and to meet their eligible needs
The Care Act 2014 sets out the law around adult social care in England. Autistic adults and their families may need care and support, provided in their community, to meet their needs and help them thrive. This could include supported living, care provided in a care home, or care provided in the person’s home.
Under the Act, local authorities have a general duty to promote a person’s wellbeing and a duty to prevent or delay the development of needs for support. The expectation behind this duty is that they should provide the right support, as soon as possible, for people with eligible needs.
A local authority has a duty under Section 9 of the Care Act 2014 to assess a person who “appears to” be in need of care and support. They must do this when requested, regardless of the local authority’s view of the level of need for care and support, and regardless of the person’s financial resources.
The Statutory Guidance (2015) issued under the Autism Act 2009 says that: “This duty [Section 9 of the Care Act 2014] applies to people with autism and is not dependent on them having been formally diagnosed as having autism. Such an assessment should be carried out by trained practitioners, and where there are potential signs of autism, the assessment should take account of the communication needs of adults with autism. Assessment of eligibility for care services cannot be denied on the grounds of the person’s IQ.”
Although there is no time period set out in the law for completing a care and support assessment, the Local Government Social Care Ombudsman has said “We normally consider it is reasonable for this to take between four and six weeks from the date of the initial request”.
Following the assessment, the local authority must apply eligibility criteria to determine which of the needs identified during the assessment process are eligible and therefore must be met by the local authority. This duty is at Section 13 of the Care Act 2014.
The eligibility criteria are set out in the Care and Support (Eligibility Criteria) Regulations 2015. There are three criteria, which must all be met for the person’s needs to be eligible:
The adult’s needs arise from or are related to a physical or mental impairment or illness.
As a result of the adult’s needs, the adult is unable to achieve two or more of the ‘outcomes’.
As a consequence, there is or is likely to be a significant impact on the adult’s wellbeing.
The ‘outcomes’ are defined as:
Managing and maintaining nutrition.
Maintaining personal hygiene.
Managing toilet needs.
Being appropriately clothed.
Maintaining a habitable home environment.
Being able to make use of the home safely.
Developing and maintaining family or other personal relationships.
Accessing and engaging in work, training, education or volunteering.
Making use of facilities/services in the local community.
Carrying out any caring responsibilities the adult has for a child.
‘Unable to achieve’ an outcome includes any of the following:
Unable to achieve without assistance (e.g. support/prompting).
Able to achieve but causes significant pain, distress, or anxiety.
Able to achieve but endangers/is likely to endanger the health and safety of the adult or others.
Able to achieve but takes significantly longer than would normally be expected.
Once an adult has been assessed as having eligible needs, the local authority must meet those eligible needs under Section 18 of the Care Act 2014. There is also a mandatory duty on the local authority to prepare a care and support plan, under Section 24 and 25 of the Care Act 2014, and this involves helping the adult decide how their needs are to be met.
Working with experts at legal practice Rook Irwin Sweeney, the Autism Alliance has developed a set of template letters for families and autistic people covering duties in the Care Act 2014, to be used when advocating for rights with local authorities. These letters can be accessed here.
Further reading
Care Act: assessment and eligibility
Social Care Institute for Excellence
Care Act factsheets and template letters
Irwin Mitchell
A note on the Autism Act 2009
The Autism Act 2009 is an important part of the law, because it was the first Act in England to cover a specific group in society. It requires the Government to publish a strategy for meeting the needs of autistic adults in England, and keep it under review. It also requires the Government to issue guidance to local authorities and local NHS bodies in securing implementation of the strategy, and keep this guidance under review. Although this statutory guidance restates the laws and duties set out above, it also makes clear the Government’s intent in how local bodies should support autistic people and their families. This guidance is currently being revised to bring it in line with the National Strategy for Autistic Children, Young People and Families published by the Government in 2021.
What you can do if the law isn’t being complied with
We hear many stories of the law not being applied, and autistic people and their families fighting for their legal rights to be upheld.
The appropriate route to be taken will depend on the specific circumstances of the case, but here are some potential routes to take following non-compliance with the law. Please note that this is not an exhaustive list.
In the case of a family seeking an Education, Health and Care Plan, there are a number of options in the following situations:
a Local Authority has refused to undertake an Education, Health and Care needs assessment;
a Local Authority has undertaken an assessment but has refused to issue an Education, Health and Care Plan;
a Local Authority hasrefused to amend an Education, Health and Care Plan following annual review;
you are unhappy with the contents of the Education, Health and Care Plan or the school named in Section I either when the plan is first issued or after it is amended following annual review; or
the local authority decides to cease the Education, Health and Care Plan.
In these circumstances:
Disagreement Resolution is a voluntary meeting available at any stage in the Education, Health and Care Plan process and should be confidential and without prejudice. This can be arranged by contacting your Local Authority.
Mediation is a service that can only be used after a decision on the Education, Health and Care Plan has been made. This is an important stage if you are considering registering an appeal with the First-Tier Tribunal (SEND) as in most cases you will need a mediation certificate before you can register an appeal.
You will have a right of appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal (SEND), but you will have to act quickly to ensure you appeal within the legal timescales as you will need to register an appeal within 2 months of the decision or 1 month from the date of a mediation certificate (whichever is later). IPSEA can help with what you need to think about if you are considering bringing an appeal in the First-Tier Tribunal and/or mediation.
There are other routes available whether the case concerns education, health or social care.
You can try to resolve the issue through informal or formal discussions with the relevant Local Authority or relevant NHS organisation (for example, the Integrated Care Board). It is a good idea to try to keep contact to email if possible, so that you have a record and avoid misunderstanding. You should make sure that you bear in mind any deadlines for issuing appeals so that you do not miss these deadlines whilst engaging with the relevant statutory body.
Some decisions might be challengeable by way of a legal process called “judicial review”. This is a claim in the Administrative Court which considers the lawfulness of decisions of public bodies, like local authorities. Judicial review claims must be brought promptly and within three months of the decision you are seeking to challenge. In some cases, failures are ongoing, and so it’s possible that the three-month time limit might be extended in such cases; however, this is not straightforward, and there can be cost consequences when bringing a claim for judicial review, so it’s important that you seek independent legal advice at the earliest opportunity before going down this route. Examples of where judicial review might apply would be where the Local Authority is failing to provide your child or your family with social care support, or where the Local Authority is failing to provide any education to your child.
Another potential option is to use the relevant body’s complaints procedure. If this does not resolve the matter, then for complaints about Local Authorities you can contact the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, and for complaints about the NHS/Integrated Care Boards, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. There are time limits for bringing complaints, and sometimes this may not be a suitable alternative remedy, for example, if urgent action is required because a child is out of school and not receiving any education.
If an autistic child or young person has been discriminated against in school because of their autism or something related to being autistic (for example, if they have been excluded because of behaviour related to being autistic without the school having taken sufficient steps to support them, or the school has failed to make reasonable adjustments they require as a result of being autistic), then parents, or the young person if they are over compulsory school age* and have capacity, could bring a claim for disability discrimination in the First-Tier Tribunal. The Tribunal can order the school to do a number of different things (for example, reinstating an excluded pupil, or changing policies), but it cannot award monetary compensation. You may want to seek independent legal advice to assist you in determining if you have a good chance of succeeding with a disability discrimination claim before proceeding down this route.
* compulsory school age ends on the last Friday in June in the academic year in which a person turns 16.